↓ Skip to main content

Thromboprophylaxis for trauma patients

Overview of attention for article published in this source, March 2013
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thromboprophylaxis for trauma patients
Published by
John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, March 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008303.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Barrera LM, Perel P, Ker K, Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Morales Uribe CH, Luis M Barrera, Pablo Perel, Katharine Ker, Roberto Cirocchi, Eriberto Farinella, Carlos Hernando Morales Uribe

Abstract

Trauma is a leading causes of death and disability in young people. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a principal cause of death. Trauma patients are at high risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). The incidence varies according to the method used to measure the DVT and the location of the thrombosis. Due to prolonged rest and coagulation abnormalities, trauma patients are at increased risk of thrombus formation. Thromboprohylaxis, either mechanical or pharmacological, may decrease mortality and morbidity in trauma patients who survive beyond the first day in hospital, by decreasing the risk of VTE in this population.A previous systematic review did not find evidence of effectiveness for either pharmacological or mechanical interventions. However, this systematic review was conducted 10 years ago and most of the included studies were of poor quality. Since then new trials have been conducted. Although current guidelines recommend the use of thromboprophylaxis in trauma patients, there has not been a comprehensive and updated systematic review since the one published.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 149 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 17%
Researcher 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Postgraduate 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Other 49 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 66%
Unspecified 17 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 13 8%