You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Circulating Biomarkers for Predicting Cardiovascular Disease Risk; a Systematic Review and Comprehensive Overview of Meta-Analyses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0062080 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thijs C. van Holten, Leonie F. Waanders, Philip G. de Groot, Joost Vissers, Imo E. Hoefer, Gerard Pasterkamp, Menno W. J. Prins, Mark Roest |
| Abstract |
Cardiovascular disease is one of the major causes of death worldwide. Assessing the risk for cardiovascular disease is an important aspect in clinical decision making and setting a therapeutic strategy, and the use of serological biomarkers may improve this. Despite an overwhelming number of studies and meta-analyses on biomarkers and cardiovascular disease, there are no comprehensive studies comparing the relevance of each biomarker. We performed a systematic review of meta-analyses on levels of serological biomarkers for atherothrombosis to compare the relevance of the most commonly studied biomarkers. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 198 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 17% |
| Researcher | 31 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 46 | 22% |
| Unknown | 30 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 82 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 8% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#5,315,603
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#87,969
of 223,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,358
of 209,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,240
of 5,037 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 223,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,037 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.