↓ Skip to main content

Cannabis intoxication inhibits avoidance action tendencies: a field study in the Amsterdam coffee shops

Overview of attention for article published in Psychopharmacology, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cannabis intoxication inhibits avoidance action tendencies: a field study in the Amsterdam coffee shops
Published in
Psychopharmacology, April 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00213-013-3097-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janna Cousijn, Robin W. M. Snoek, Reinout W. Wiers

Abstract

Experimental laboratory studies suggest that the approach bias (relatively fast approach responses) toward substance-related materials plays an important role in problematic substance use. How this bias is moderated by intention to use versus recent use remains unknown. Moreover, the relationship between approach bias and other motivational processes (satiation and craving) and executive functioning remains unclear.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Netherlands 1 3%
New Zealand 1 3%
Unknown 35 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 28%
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Master 5 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 44%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 15%
Neuroscience 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Social Sciences 3 8%
Other 6 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2013.
All research outputs
#9,765,656
of 12,218,786 outputs
Outputs from Psychopharmacology
#3,539
of 4,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,707
of 139,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychopharmacology
#41
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,218,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,093 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.