You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Motion artifact correction for cone beam CT stroke imaging: a prospective series
Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery, December 2022
Nicole M Cancelliere, Fred van Nijnatten, Eric Hummel, Paul Withagen, Peter van de Haar, Hidehisa Nishi, Ronit Agid, Patrick Nicholson, Bertan Hallacoglu, Marijke van Vlimmeren, Vitor M Pereira
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||6||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||25%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||1||25%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 396. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
of 2,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 454,431 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,431 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.