You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Deficit of theory of mind after temporal lobe cerebral infarction
|
---|---|
Published in |
Behavioral and Brain Functions, April 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1744-9081-9-15 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chunhua Xi, Youling Zhu, Chunyan Zhu, Daohui Song, Yongguang Wang, Kai Wang |
Abstract |
Previous studies have indicated that the temporal lobe is involved in theory of mind (ToM). However, little attention has been paid to ToM in patients with cerebral infarction. In this study, we investigated the ability of ToM in patients with temporal lobe cerebral infarction (TLCI) using a variety of tests. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 1% |
China | 1 | 1% |
Belgium | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 69 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 13% |
Researcher | 7 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 18 | 25% |
Unknown | 18 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Psychology | 26 | 36% |
Neuroscience | 7 | 10% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2013.
All research outputs
#14,106,031
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#200
of 391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,287
of 196,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Behavioral and Brain Functions
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 196,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.