↓ Skip to main content

Tirilazad for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tirilazad for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006778.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shihong Zhang, Lichun Wang, Ming Liu, Bo Wu

Abstract

Delayed cerebral ischaemia is a significant contributor to poor outcome (death or disability) in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). Tirilazad is considered to have neuroprotective properties in animal models of acute cerebral ischaemia.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 79 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 14%
Unspecified 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Other 24 30%
Unknown 1 1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 54%
Unspecified 12 15%
Neuroscience 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 1 1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2013.
All research outputs
#9,618,848
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8,137
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,100
of 145,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#79
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.