↓ Skip to main content

Valid inferences about soil carbon in heterogeneous landscapes

Overview of attention for article published in Geoderma, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 2,969)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
211 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Valid inferences about soil carbon in heterogeneous landscapes
Published in
Geoderma, February 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2022.116323
Authors

Paige Stanley, Jacob Spertus, Jessica Chiartas, Philip B. Stark, Timothy Bowles

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 211 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 33%
Other 5 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 20 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 17 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 19%
Unspecified 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 4%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 6 9%
Unknown 24 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 142. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2024.
All research outputs
#299,409
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Geoderma
#5
of 2,969 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,309
of 478,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Geoderma
#1
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,969 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 478,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.