The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Clinical genetic counseling and translation considerations for polygenic scores in personalized risk assessments: A Practice Resource from the National Society of Genetic Counselors
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Genetic Counseling, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jgc4.1668 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hannah Wand, Sarah S. Kalia, Benjamin M. Helm, Sabrina A. Suckiel, Deanna Brockman, Natalie Vriesen, Ranjit K. Goudar, Jehannine Austin, Tatiane Yanes |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 29% |
| Australia | 4 | 8% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 2% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 24 | 50% |
| Scientists | 17 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 13 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2023.
All research outputs
#864,152
of 25,163,238 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#16
of 1,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,050
of 472,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Genetic Counseling
#2
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,163,238 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.