↓ Skip to main content

Discovery of lead natural products for developing pan-SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics

Overview of attention for article published in Antiviral Research, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 2,879)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
42 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
36 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Discovery of lead natural products for developing pan-SARS-CoV-2 therapeutics
Published in
Antiviral Research, December 2022
DOI 10.1016/j.antiviral.2022.105484
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jimena Pérez-Vargas, Tirosh Shapira, Andrea D Olmstead, Ivan Villanueva, Connor A H Thompson, Siobhan Ennis, Guang Gao, Joshua De Guzman, David E Williams, Meng Wang, Aaleigha Chin, Diana Bautista-Sánchez, Olga Agafitei, Paul Levett, Xuping Xie, Genoveffa Nuzzo, Vitor F Freire, Jairo I Quintana-Bulla, Darlon I Bernardi, Juliana R Gubiani, Virayu Suthiphasilp, Achara Raksat, Pornphimol Meesakul, Isaraporn Polbuppha, Sarot Cheenpracha, Wuttichai Jaidee, Kwanjai Kanokmedhakul, Chavi Yenjai, Boonyanoot Chaiyosang, Helder Lopes Teles, Emiliano Manzo, Angelo Fontana, Richard Leduc, Pierre-Luc Boudreault, Roberto G S Berlinck, Surat Laphookhieo, Somdej Kanokmedhakul, Ian Tietjen, Artem Cherkasov, Mel Krajden, Ivan Robert Nabi, Masahiro Niikura, Pei-Yong Shi, Raymond J Andersen, François Jean

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Student > Master 1 5%
Librarian 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 55%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 3 15%
Unknown 10 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 349. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2024.
All research outputs
#96,014
of 25,958,626 outputs
Outputs from Antiviral Research
#9
of 2,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,570
of 488,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antiviral Research
#1
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,958,626 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 488,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.