↓ Skip to main content

Human Vocal Attractiveness as Signaled by Body Size Projection

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
31 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Human Vocal Attractiveness as Signaled by Body Size Projection
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0062397
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Xu, Albert Lee, Wing-Li Wu, Xuan Liu, Peter Birkholz

Abstract

Voice, as a secondary sexual characteristic, is known to affect the perceived attractiveness of human individuals. But the underlying mechanism of vocal attractiveness has remained unclear. Here, we presented human listeners with acoustically altered natural sentences and fully synthetic sentences with systematically manipulated pitch, formants and voice quality based on a principle of body size projection reported for animal calls and emotional human vocal expressions. The results show that male listeners preferred a female voice that signals a small body size, with relatively high pitch, wide formant dispersion and breathy voice, while female listeners preferred a male voice that signals a large body size with low pitch and narrow formant dispersion. Interestingly, however, male vocal attractiveness was also enhanced by breathiness, which presumably softened the aggressiveness associated with a large body size. These results, together with the additional finding that the same vocal dimensions also affect emotion judgment, indicate that humans still employ a vocal interaction strategy used in animal calls despite the development of complex language.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 3%
United States 2 1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Unknown 142 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Student > Bachelor 24 16%
Researcher 22 15%
Student > Master 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 38 26%
Psychology 32 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 7%
Neuroscience 7 5%
Computer Science 6 4%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 27 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 235. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#159,663
of 25,330,051 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#2,391
of 219,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#931
of 199,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#53
of 4,980 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,330,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 219,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 199,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,980 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.