↓ Skip to main content

Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human’s attention

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Cognition, December 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
214 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
285 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human’s attention
Published in
Animal Cognition, December 2003
DOI 10.1007/s10071-003-0205-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Márta Gácsi, Ádám Miklósi, Orsolya Varga, József Topál, Vilmos Csányi

Abstract

The ability of animals to use behavioral/facial cues in detection of human attention has been widely investigated. In this test series we studied the ability of dogs to recognize human attention in different experimental situations (ball-fetching game, fetching objects on command, begging from humans). The attentional state of the humans was varied along two variables: (1) facing versus not facing the dog; (2) visible versus non-visible eyes. In the first set of experiments (fetching) the owners were told to take up different body positions (facing or not facing the dog) and to either cover or not cover their eyes with a blindfold. In the second set of experiments (begging) dogs had to choose between two eating humans based on either the visibility of the eyes or direction of the face. Our results show that the efficiency of dogs to discriminate between "attentive" and "inattentive" humans depended on the context of the test, but they could rely on the orientation of the body, the orientation of the head and the visibility of the eyes. With the exception of the fetching-game situation, they brought the object to the front of the human (even if he/she turned his/her back towards the dog), and preferentially begged from the facing (or seeing) human. There were also indications that dogs were sensitive to the visibility of the eyes because they showed increased hesitative behavior when approaching a blindfolded owner, and they also preferred to beg from the person with visible eyes. We conclude that dogs are able to rely on the same set of human facial cues for detection of attention, which form the behavioral basis of understanding attention in humans. Showing the ability of recognizing human attention across different situations dogs proved to be more flexible than chimpanzees investigated in similar circumstances.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 285 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Hungary 3 1%
Austria 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 264 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 57 20%
Student > Master 45 16%
Researcher 40 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Other 26 9%
Other 40 14%
Unknown 44 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 104 36%
Psychology 61 21%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 20 7%
Social Sciences 9 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 2%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 59 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,494,073
of 22,986,950 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cognition
#351
of 1,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,074
of 133,869 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cognition
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,986,950 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,459 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,869 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.