You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Are NSAIDs Useful to Treat Alzheimer's Disease or Mild Cognitive Impairment?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnagi.2010.00019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bruno P. Imbimbo, Vincenzo Solfrizzi, Francesco Panza |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 243 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 42 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 16% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 27 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 26 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 9% |
| Other | 49 | 20% |
| Unknown | 57 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,803,040
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#476
of 5,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,889
of 175,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.