You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Vitamin D as an adjunct to antibiotics for the treatment of acute childhood pneumonia
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd011597.pub3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Rashmi R Das, Meenu Singh, Sushree S Naik |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 6% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
Turkey | 1 | 6% |
Paraguay | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
Scientists | 3 | 19% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 19% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 68 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 32 | 47% |
Other | 4 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
Researcher | 4 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 9% |
Unknown | 15 | 22% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 32 | 47% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 3% |
Unknown | 20 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#1,171,064
of 24,340,143 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,553
of 12,892 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,689
of 448,631 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#21
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,340,143 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,892 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,631 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.