↓ Skip to main content

Influence of ROBO1 and RORA on Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Reveals Genetically Distinct Phenotypes in Disease Pathophysiology

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of ROBO1 and RORA on Risk of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Reveals Genetically Distinct Phenotypes in Disease Pathophysiology
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0025775
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gyungah Jun, Michael Nicolaou, Margaux A. Morrison, Jacqueline Buros, Denise J. Morgan, Monte J. Radeke, Yoshihiro Yonekawa, Evangelia E. Tsironi, Maria G. Kotoula, Fani Zacharaki, Nissa Mollema, Yang Yuan, Joan W. Miller, Neena B. Haider, Gregory S. Hageman, Ivana K. Kim, Debra A. Schaumberg, Lindsay A. Farrer, Margaret M. DeAngelis

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
Japan 1 3%
France 1 3%
Peru 1 3%
Unknown 33 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Other 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 9 24%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Neuroscience 4 11%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,962,613
of 23,544,006 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#76,104
of 201,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,767
of 135,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#754
of 2,624 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,544,006 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,624 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.