↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of Vitamin D Standardization Program protocols for standardizing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D data: a case study of the program's potential for national nutrition and health surveys

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
125 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of Vitamin D Standardization Program protocols for standardizing serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D data: a case study of the program's potential for national nutrition and health surveys
Published in
American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, April 2013
DOI 10.3945/ajcn.112.057182
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin D Cashman, Mairead Kiely, Michael Kinsella, Ramón A Durazo-Arvizu, Lu Tian, Yue Zhang, Alice Lucey, Albert Flynn, Michael J Gibney, Hubert W Vesper, Karen W Phinney, Paul M Coates, Mary F Picciano, Christopher T Sempos

Abstract

The Vitamin D Standardization Program (VDSP) has developed protocols for standardizing procedures of 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] measurement in National Health/Nutrition Surveys to promote 25(OH)D measurements that are accurate and comparable over time, location, and laboratory procedure to improve public health practice.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
Australia 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Unknown 58 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 10%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 18 29%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2016.
All research outputs
#696,587
of 17,360,236 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#1,618
of 11,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,351
of 161,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#27
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,360,236 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,882 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,960 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.