↓ Skip to main content

Protective effectiveness of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against the omicron variant and severe disease: a systematic review and meta-regression

Overview of attention for article published in Lancet Infectious Diseases, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 6,044)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
245 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protective effectiveness of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection and hybrid immunity against the omicron variant and severe disease: a systematic review and meta-regression
Published in
Lancet Infectious Diseases, January 2023
DOI 10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00801-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niklas Bobrovitz, Harriet Ware, Xiaomeng Ma, Zihan Li, Reza Hosseini, Christian Cao, Anabel Selemon, Mairead Whelan, Zahra Premji, Hanane Issa, Brianna Cheng, Laith J Abu Raddad, David L Buckeridge, Maria D Van Kerkhove, Vanessa Piechotta, Melissa M Higdon, Annelies Wilder-Smith, Isabel Bergeri, Daniel R Feikin, Rahul K Arora, Minal K Patel, Lorenzo Subissi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,730 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 185 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 14%
Researcher 24 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 9%
Other 15 8%
Professor 11 6%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 55 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 17%
Unspecified 26 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 61 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1888. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#5,121
of 25,416,581 outputs
Outputs from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#44
of 6,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153
of 472,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lancet Infectious Diseases
#1
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,416,581 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,044 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 92.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.