↓ Skip to main content

Impacto do tipo de incontinência urinária sobre a qualidade de vida de usuárias do Sistema Único de Saúde no Sudeste do Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia revista da Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impacto do tipo de incontinência urinária sobre a qualidade de vida de usuárias do Sistema Único de Saúde no Sudeste do Brasil
Published in
Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia revista da Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, August 2015
DOI 10.1590/so100-720320150005394
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlos Augusto Faria, José Rodrigo de Moraes, Bruna Ribeiro Daflon Monnerat, Karina Agrizzi Verediano, Pedro Affonso Manhães Maciel Hawerroth, Sandra Costa Fonseca

Abstract

To identify the impact of urinary incontinence (UI) on quality of life (QoL), to compare the scores of QoL domains in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI), overactive bladder (OAB) and mixed incontinence (MUI) and to establish the association between the clinical type of UI and the impact on QoL. Data of 181 incontinent women attended at a public hospital were collected regarding age, body mass index (BMI) and co-morbidities. King's Health Questionnaire (KHQ) was applied and patients were classified into two groups according to the self-assessment of incontinence impact. KHQ scores were compared by the Mann-Whitney test. Depending on their urinary symptoms, women were divided into SUI, OAB and MUI groups and their scores in the KHQ domains were compared by the Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests. The odds ratio (OR) of a woman reporting a worse effect of UI on QoL was estimated using the binary logistic model. The control variables were: age, BMI and number of co-morbidities. A significant difference was found between the two groups of self-assessment of UI impact for all KHQ domains. The MUI group showed worse scores than the SUI group for all domains, and OAB group, for limitation of physical and daily activities. There was a significant difference between the odds of the women in the SUI and MUI groups reporting worse effects of UI on QoL (OR=2.9; p=0.02). As reported at other reference services, MUI was the most commom type, and urinary loss had a moderate/major impact on QoL, affecting mainly role limitations domain. The adjusted analysis showed that women with MUI had almost three times greater odds of reporting worse impact on QoL than women with SUI.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 10%
Unknown 26 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 3 10%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 14%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Sports and Recreations 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2016.
All research outputs
#17,729,864
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia revista da Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
#2
of 2 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,991
of 277,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetrícia revista da Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,646 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.