You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Harnessing Different Motivational Frames via Mobile Phones to Promote Daily Physical Activity and Reduce Sedentary Behavior in Aging Adults
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0062613 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Abby C. King, Eric B. Hekler, Lauren A. Grieco, Sandra J. Winter, Jylana L. Sheats, Matthew P. Buman, Banny Banerjee, Thomas N. Robinson, Jesse Cirimele |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 24% |
| Switzerland | 4 | 16% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 48% |
| Scientists | 7 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 600 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 1% |
| Unknown | 569 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 130 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 108 | 18% |
| Researcher | 68 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 59 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 45 | 8% |
| Other | 97 | 16% |
| Unknown | 93 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 15% |
| Psychology | 81 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 61 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 53 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 52 | 9% |
| Other | 130 | 22% |
| Unknown | 132 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,225,511
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#15,464
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,291
of 210,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#310
of 5,035 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,035 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.