↓ Skip to main content

Biologic Adjuvants for Rotator Cuff Augmentation

Overview of attention for article published in Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biologic Adjuvants for Rotator Cuff Augmentation
Published in
Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine, March 2023
DOI 10.1016/j.otsm.2023.150988
Authors

Colin L. Uyeki, Nicholas P.J. Perry, Evan M. Farina, Charles Wang, Robert J. Nascimento, Augustus D. Mazzocca

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,866,607
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine
#102
of 155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#217,741
of 403,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Operative Techniques in Sports Medicine
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 403,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.