↓ Skip to main content

The unintended negative consequences of knowledge translation in healthcare: A systematic scoping review

Overview of attention for article published in Health Sociology Review, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 293)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
50 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The unintended negative consequences of knowledge translation in healthcare: A systematic scoping review
Published in
Health Sociology Review, January 2023
DOI 10.1080/14461242.2022.2151372
Authors

Ann Dadich, Priya Vaughan, Katherine Boydell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 2 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 2 20%
Unspecified 1 10%
Psychology 1 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 10%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 3 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,274,936
of 25,359,594 outputs
Outputs from Health Sociology Review
#24
of 293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,177
of 471,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Sociology Review
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,359,594 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 471,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.