↓ Skip to main content

Abolishment of morphology-based taxa and change to binomial species names: 2022 taxonomy update of the ICTV bacterial viruses subcommittee

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Virology, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#13 of 4,633)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
174 X users
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
158 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
258 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Abolishment of morphology-based taxa and change to binomial species names: 2022 taxonomy update of the ICTV bacterial viruses subcommittee
Published in
Archives of Virology, January 2023
DOI 10.1007/s00705-022-05694-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dann Turner, Andrey N. Shkoporov, Cédric Lood, Andrew D. Millard, Bas E. Dutilh, Poliane Alfenas-Zerbini, Leonardo J. van Zyl, Ramy K. Aziz, Hanna M. Oksanen, Minna M. Poranen, Andrew M. Kropinski, Jakub Barylski, J Rodney Brister, Nina Chanisvili, Rob A. Edwards, François Enault, Annika Gillis, Petar Knezevic, Mart Krupovic, Ipek Kurtböke, Alla Kushkina, Rob Lavigne, Susan Lehman, Malgorzata Lobocka, Cristina Moraru, Andrea Moreno Switt, Vera Morozova, Jesca Nakavuma, Alejandro Reyes Muñoz, Jānis Rūmnieks, BL Sarkar, Matthew B. Sullivan, Jumpei Uchiyama, Johannes Wittmann, Tong Yigang, Evelien M. Adriaenssens

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 174 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 258 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 258 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 16%
Student > Master 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Unspecified 8 3%
Other 33 13%
Unknown 124 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 49 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 26 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 9%
Unspecified 8 3%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Other 17 7%
Unknown 130 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2024.
All research outputs
#398,947
of 26,296,035 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#13
of 4,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,455
of 487,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#1
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,296,035 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,633 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.