↓ Skip to main content

CacheSack: Theory and Experience of Google’s Admission Optimization for Datacenter Flash Caches

Overview of attention for article published in ACM Transactions on Storage, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CacheSack: Theory and Experience of Google’s Admission Optimization for Datacenter Flash Caches
Published in
ACM Transactions on Storage, March 2023
DOI 10.1145/3582014
Authors

Tzu-Wei Yang, Seth Pollen, Mustafa Uysal, Arif Merchant, Homer Wolfmeister, Junaid Khalid

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#19,815,815
of 25,225,928 outputs
Outputs from ACM Transactions on Storage
#150
of 154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,317
of 415,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACM Transactions on Storage
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,225,928 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 415,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.