You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The case of T-ALL presenting with NK phenotype after COVID-19 vaccination
|
---|---|
Published in |
Pathology - Research & Practice, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.prp.2023.154310 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Eriko Yanagida, Akira Kubota, Hiroaki Miyoshi, Koichi Ohshima, Toshiro Kawakita, Toshihiko Murayama |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 145 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 20 | 14% |
Japan | 3 | 2% |
United States | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Algeria | 1 | <1% |
New Caledonia | 1 | <1% |
Panama | 1 | <1% |
Réunion | 1 | <1% |
Other | 4 | 3% |
Unknown | 109 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 142 | 98% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 1% |
Scientists | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
Professor | 1 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Researcher | 1 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 20% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 10% |
Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2024.
All research outputs
#530,758
of 25,941,588 outputs
Outputs from Pathology - Research & Practice
#9
of 1,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,496
of 495,106 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pathology - Research & Practice
#1
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,941,588 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,749 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 495,106 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.