↓ Skip to main content

Rational and design of the REMOTE trial: An exploratory, pilot study to analyze REtinal MicrOcirculaTion in wEightlessness.

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Hemorheology & Microcirculation, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rational and design of the REMOTE trial: An exploratory, pilot study to analyze REtinal MicrOcirculaTion in wEightlessness.
Published in
Clinical Hemorheology & Microcirculation, January 2023
DOI 10.3233/ch-221691
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephan Binneboessel, Maryna Masyuk, Kerstin Piayda, Raphael Romano Bruno, Bernhard Wernly, Peter Jirak, Georg Wolff, Norbert Gerdes, Philipp Heinrich Baldia, Malte Kelm, Fabian Nienhaus, Alexander Lang, Holger Winkels, Gerd Geerling, Rainer Guthoff, Sema Kaya, Gerald Flossmann, Thomas Riemer, Michael Baertschi, Christian Jung

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2023.
All research outputs
#17,149,582
of 26,180,771 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Hemorheology & Microcirculation
#134
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,414
of 487,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Hemorheology & Microcirculation
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,771 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.