You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Cerebral Microvasculature in Schizophrenia: A Laser Capture Microdissection Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003964 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura W. Harris, Matthew Wayland, Martin Lan, Margaret Ryan, Thomas Giger, Helen Lockstone, Irene Wuethrich, Michael Mimmack, Lan Wang, Mark Kotter, Rachel Craddock, Sabine Bahn |
| Abstract |
Previous studies of brain and peripheral tissues in schizophrenia patients have indicated impaired energy supply to the brain. A number of studies have also demonstrated dysfunction of the microvasculature in schizophrenia patients. Together these findings are consistent with a hypothesis of blood-brain barrier dysfunction in schizophrenia. In this study, we have investigated the cerebral vascular endothelium of schizophrenia patients at the level of transcriptomics. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 17 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 32% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 15% |
| Neuroscience | 10 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2013.
All research outputs
#20,191,579
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,043
of 193,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,105
of 154,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#405
of 414 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 154,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 414 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.