↓ Skip to main content

Cardiac rehabilitation in coronary artery bypass grafting patients: Effect of eight weeks of moderate-intensity continuous training versus high-intensity interval training.

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Hemorheology & Microcirculation, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cardiac rehabilitation in coronary artery bypass grafting patients: Effect of eight weeks of moderate-intensity continuous training versus high-intensity interval training.
Published in
Clinical Hemorheology & Microcirculation, January 2023
DOI 10.3233/ch-221605
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neda Shafiee, Negin Kordi, Keivan Gadruni, Ziba SalehFard, Friedrich Jung, Naser Heidari

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 4 31%
Student > Bachelor 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Student > Postgraduate 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 4 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Sports and Recreations 1 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,698,350
of 26,180,771 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Hemorheology & Microcirculation
#127
of 394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,785
of 487,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Hemorheology & Microcirculation
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,771 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 487,415 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.