The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2023
|
DOI | 10.1002/14651858.cd015167.pub2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Catherine Kimber, Sarah J Valk, Khai Li Chai, Vanessa Piechotta, Claire Iannizzi, Ina Monsef, Erica M Wood, Abigail A Lamikanra, David J Roberts, Zoe McQuilten, Cynthia So-Osman, Lise J Estcourt, Nicole Skoetz |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 2 | 17% |
United States | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 9 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 21 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 25% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 8% |
Unknown | 24 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2023.
All research outputs
#2,580,110
of 26,735,161 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#4,983
of 13,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,745
of 494,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#55
of 123 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,735,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,273 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 123 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.