You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of Adaptation Currents on Synchronization of Coupled Exponential Integrate-and-Fire Neurons
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, April 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002478 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Josef Ladenbauer, Moritz Augustin, LieJune Shiau, Klaus Obermayer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 94 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 33% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Physics and Astronomy | 18 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 18 | 18% |
| Engineering | 14 | 14% |
| Mathematics | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2013.
All research outputs
#16,874,917
of 25,593,129 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,258
of 9,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,473
of 174,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#81
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,593,129 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,006 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.