↓ Skip to main content

Proteomic Analysis Reveals New Cardiac-Specific Dystrophin-Associated Proteins

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Proteomic Analysis Reveals New Cardiac-Specific Dystrophin-Associated Proteins
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0043515
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eric K. Johnson, Liwen Zhang, Marvin E. Adams, Alistair Phillips, Michael A. Freitas, Stanley C. Froehner, Kari B. Green-Church, Federica Montanaro

Abstract

Mutations affecting the expression of dystrophin result in progressive loss of skeletal muscle function and cardiomyopathy leading to early mortality. Interestingly, clinical studies revealed no correlation in disease severity or age of onset between cardiac and skeletal muscles, suggesting that dystrophin may play overlapping yet different roles in these two striated muscles. Since dystrophin serves as a structural and signaling scaffold, functional differences likely arise from tissue-specific protein interactions. To test this, we optimized a proteomics-based approach to purify, identify and compare the interactome of dystrophin between cardiac and skeletal muscles from as little as 50 mg of starting material. We found selective tissue-specific differences in the protein associations of cardiac and skeletal muscle full length dystrophin to syntrophins and dystrobrevins that couple dystrophin to signaling pathways. Importantly, we identified novel cardiac-specific interactions of dystrophin with proteins known to regulate cardiac contraction and to be involved in cardiac disease. Our approach overcomes a major challenge in the muscular dystrophy field of rapidly and consistently identifying bona fide dystrophin-interacting proteins in tissues. In addition, our findings support the existence of cardiac-specific functions of dystrophin and may guide studies into early triggers of cardiac disease in Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 1%
France 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 32%
Researcher 11 15%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 15 20%
Unknown 9 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 15%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 9 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2013.
All research outputs
#18,337,420
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#154,134
of 193,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,760
of 169,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#3,429
of 4,365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,381 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.