You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Critérios para decanulação da traqueostomia: revisão de literatura
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CoDAS, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1590/2317-1782/20192018228 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gisele Chagas de Medeiros, Fernanda Chiarion Sassi, Camila Lirani-Silva, Claudia Regina Furquim de Andrade |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 220 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 220 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 17 | 8% |
| Researcher | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 15% |
| Unknown | 96 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 41 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 99 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2023.
All research outputs
#17,730,887
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from CoDAS
#34
of 92 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,126
of 449,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CoDAS
#17
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.