↓ Skip to main content

Checklist de angiospermas da APA Municipal do Rio Vermelho/Humboldt, Santa Catarina, Brasil

Overview of attention for article published in Rodriguésia, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Checklist de angiospermas da APA Municipal do Rio Vermelho/Humboldt, Santa Catarina, Brasil
Published in
Rodriguésia, January 2019
DOI 10.1590/2175-7860201970063
Authors

Fabrício Schmitz Meyer, Paulo Schwirkowski

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#18,604,390
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Rodriguésia
#229
of 242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,246
of 437,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rodriguésia
#19
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 242 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,847 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.