The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Real-World Evidence of Tofacinitib in Ulcerative Colitis: Short-Term and Long-Term Effectiveness and Safety
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Gastroenterology, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002145 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
María Chaparro, Diana Acosta, Cristina Rodríguez, Francisco Mesonero, Miren Vicuña, Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta, Agnès Fernández-Clotet, Álvaro Hernández Martínez, Maite Arroyo, Isabel Vera, Alexandra Ruiz-Cerulla, Beatriz Sicilia, M. José Cabello Tapia, Carmen Muñoz Villafranca, Jesús Castro-Poceiro, Jesús Martínez Cadilla, Mónica Sierra-Ausín, Juan María Vázquez Morón, Raquel Vicente Lidón, Fernando Bermejo, Vanesa Royo, Margalida Calafat, Carlos González-Muñoza, Eduardo Leo Carnerero, Noemi Manceñido Marcos, Leyanira Torrealba, Horacio Alonso-Galán, José Manuel Benítez, Yolanda Ber Nieto, M. Teresa Diz-Lois Palomares, María José García, José Fernando Muñoz, Edisa María Armesto González, Xavier Calvet, Alejandro Hernández-Camba, Rosa Eva Madrigal Domínguez, Luis Menchén, José Lázaro Pérez Calle, Marta Piqueras, Carmen Dueñas Sadornil, Belén Botella, Teresa de Jesús Martínez-Pérez, Laura Ramos, María Carmen Rodríguez-Grau, Elena San Miguel, José Luis Fernández Forcelledo, Paola María Fradejas Salazar, Marifé García-Sepulcre, Ana Gutiérrez, Jordina Llaó, Eva Sesé Abizanda, Maia Boscá-Watts, Eduardo Iyo, Alma Keco-Huerga, Carmen Martínez Bonil, Elena Peña González, Pablo Pérez-Galindo, Pilar Varela, Javier P. Gisbert, on Behalf of To-ReWard Study Group |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 15 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 65% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 59% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 36% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#1,776,229
of 26,268,316 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Gastroenterology
#854
of 5,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,765
of 494,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Gastroenterology
#27
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,268,316 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,922 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.