↓ Skip to main content

Diretriz Brasileira de Dispositivos Cardíacos Eletrônicos Implantáveis – 2023

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, January 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diretriz Brasileira de Dispositivos Cardíacos Eletrônicos Implantáveis – 2023
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, January 2023
DOI 10.36660/abc.20220892
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ricardo Alkmim Teixeira, Alexsandro Alves Fagundes, José Mário Baggio Junior, Júlio César de Oliveira, Paulo de Tarso Jorge Medeiros, Bruno Pereira Valdigem, Luiz Antônio Castilho Teno, Rodrigo Tavares Silva, Celso Salgado de Melo, Jorge Elias Neto, Antonio Vitor Moraes Júnior, Anisio Alexandre Andrade Pedrosa, Fernando Mello Porto, Hélio Lima de Brito Júnior, Thiago Gonçalves Schroder E Souza, José Carlos Pachón Mateos, Luis Gustavo Belo de Moraes, Alexander Romeno Janner Dal Forno, Andre Luiz Buchele D'Avila, Diogo Alberto de Magalhães Cavaco, Ricardo Ryoshim Kuniyoshi, Mauricio Pimentel, Luiz Eduardo Montenegro Camanho, Eduardo Benchimol Saad, Leandro Ioschpe Zimerman, Eduardo Bartholomay Oliveira, Mauricio Ibrahim Scanavacca, Martino Martinelli Filho, Carlos Eduardo Batista de Lima, Giselle de Lima Peixoto, Francisco Carlos da Costa Darrieux, Jussara de Oliveira Pinheiro Duarte, Silas Dos Santos Galvão Filho, Eduardo Rodrigues Bento Costa, Enrique Indalécio Pachón Mateo, Sissy Lara De Melo, Thiago da Rocha Rodrigues, Eduardo Arrais Rocha, Denise Tessariol Hachul, Adalberto Menezes Lorga Filho, Silvana Angelina D'Orio Nishioka, Eduardo Barreto Gadelha, Roberto Costa, Veridiana Silva de Andrade, Gustavo Gomes Torres, Nestor Rodrigues de Oliveira Neto, Fernando Antonio Lucchese, Henrique Murad, José Wanderley Neto, Paulo Roberto Slud Brofman, Rui M S Almeida, João Carlos Ferreira Leal

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 27 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 11 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 33%
Unspecified 3 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2023.
All research outputs
#7,147,013
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#172
of 1,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,676
of 472,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,211 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.