You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Reference Methylome Database and Analysis Pipeline to Facilitate Integrative and Comparative Epigenomics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0081148 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qiang Song, Benjamin Decato, Elizabeth E. Hong, Meng Zhou, Fang Fang, Jianghan Qu, Tyler Garvin, Michael Kessler, Jun Zhou, Andrew D. Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 280 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 266 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 70 | 25% |
| Researcher | 65 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 39 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 96 | 34% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 80 | 29% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 23 | 8% |
| Unknown | 50 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2016.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#119,035
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,189
of 326,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,189
of 5,115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.