↓ Skip to main content

Differential expression of histone deacetylases HDAC1, 2 and 3 in human breast cancer - overexpression of HDAC2 and HDAC3 is associated with clinicopathological indicators of disease progression

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential expression of histone deacetylases HDAC1, 2 and 3 in human breast cancer - overexpression of HDAC2 and HDAC3 is associated with clinicopathological indicators of disease progression
Published in
BMC Cancer, April 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-13-215
Pubmed ID
Authors

Berit Maria Müller, Lisa Jana, Atsuko Kasajima, Annika Lehmann, Judith Prinzler, Jan Budczies, Klaus-Jürgen Winzer, Manfred Dietel, Wilko Weichert, Carsten Denkert

Abstract

In breast cancer, the role of epigenetic alterations including modifications of the acetylation status of histones in carcinogenesis has been an important research focus during the last years. An increased deacetylation of histones leads to increased cell proliferation, cell migration, angiogenesis and invasion. Class 1 histone deacetylases (HDAC) seem to be most important during carcinogenesis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 146 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 19%
Student > Master 19 13%
Researcher 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 9 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 37 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 7%
Chemistry 11 7%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 45 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2013.
All research outputs
#6,342,537
of 22,708,120 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#1,610
of 8,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,209
of 192,344 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#23
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,708,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,259 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,344 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.