↓ Skip to main content

Mountain goat abundance and population trends in the Olympic Mountains, northwestern Washington, 2016

Overview of attention for article published in US Geological Survey, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mountain goat abundance and population trends in the Olympic Mountains, northwestern Washington, 2016
Published in
US Geological Survey, January 2016
DOI 10.3133/ofr20161185
Authors

Kurt J. Jenkins, Patricia J. Happe, Katherine F. Beirne, William T. Baccus, Jenkins, Kurt J., Happe, Patricia J., Beirne, Katherine F., Baccus, William T.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2017.
All research outputs
#10,717,775
of 18,690,799 outputs
Outputs from US Geological Survey
#893
of 1,807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,957
of 405,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from US Geological Survey
#26
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,690,799 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,807 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.