You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neotropical ornithology: Reckoning with historical assumptions, removing systemic barriers, and reimagining the future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ornithological Applications, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ornithapp/duac046 |
| Authors |
Letícia Soares, Kristina L Cockle, Ernesto Ruelas Inzunza, José Tomás Ibarra, Carolina Isabel Miño, Santiago Zuluaga, Elisa Bonaccorso, Juan Camilo Ríos-Orjuela, Flavia A Montaño-Centellas, Juan F Freile, María A Echeverry-Galvis, Eugenia Bianca Bonaparte, Luisa Maria Diele-Viegas, Karina Speziale, Sergio A Cabrera-Cruz, Orlando Acevedo-Charry, Enriqueta Velarde, Cecilia Cuatianquiz Lima, Valeria S Ojeda, Carla S Fontana, Alejandra Echeverri, Sergio A Lambertucci, Regina H Macedo, Alberto Esquivel, Steven C Latta, Irene Ruvalcaba-Ortega, Maria Alice S Alves, Diego Santiago-Alarcon, Alejandro Bodrati, Fernando González-García, Nestor Fariña, Juan Esteban Martínez-Gómez, Rubén Ortega-Álvarez, María Gabriela Núñez Montellano, Camila C Ribas, Carlos Bosque, Adrián S Di Giacomo, Juan I Areta, Carine Emer, Lourdes Mugica Valdés, Clementina González, María Emilia Rebollo, Giselle Mangini, Carlos Lara, José Cristóbal Pizarro, Victor R Cueto, Pablo Rafael Bolaños-Sittler, Juan Francisco Ornelas, Martín Acosta, Marcos Cenizo, Miguel Ângelo Marini, Leopoldo D Vázquez-Reyes, José Antonio González-Oreja, Leandro Bugoni, Martin Quiroga, Valentina Ferretti, Lilian T Manica, Juan M Grande, Flor Rodríguez-Gómez, Soledad Diaz, Nicole Büttner, Lucia Mentesana, Marconi Campos-Cerqueira, Fernando Gabriel López, André C Guaraldo, Ian MacGregor-Fors, Francisca Helena Aguiar-Silva, Cristina Y Miyaki, Silvina Ippi, Emilse Mérida, Cecilia Kopuchian, Cintia Cornelius, Paula L Enríquez, Natalia Ocampo-Peñuela, Katherine Renton, Jhan C Salazar, Luis Sandoval, Jorge Correa Sandoval, Pedro X Astudillo, Ancilleno O Davis, Nicolás Cantero, David Ocampo, Oscar Humberto Marin Gomez, Sérgio Henrique Borges, Sergio Cordoba-Cordoba, Alejandro G Pietrek, Carlos B de Araújo, Guillermo Fernández, Horacio de la Cueva, João Marcos Guimarães Capurucho, Nicole A Gutiérrez-Ramos, Ariane Ferreira, Lílian Mariana Costa, Cecilia Soldatini, Hannah M Madden, Miguel Angel Santillán, Gustavo Jiménez-Uzcátegui, Emilio A Jordan, Guilherme Henrique Silva Freitas, Paulo C Pulgarin-R, Roberto Carlos Almazán-Núñez, Tomás Altamirano, Milka R Gomez, Myriam C Velazquez, Rebeca Irala, Facundo A Gandoy, Andrea C Trigueros, Carlos A Ferreyra, Yuri Vladimir Albores-Barajas, Markus Tellkamp, Carine Dantas Oliveira, Andrea Weiler, Ma del Coro Arizmendi, Adrianne G Tossas, Rebecca Zarza, Gabriel Serra, Rafael Villegas-Patraca, Facundo Gabriel Di Sallo, Cleiton Valentim, Jorge Ignacio Noriega, Giraldo Alayon García, Martín R de la Peña, Rosendo M Fraga, Pedro Vitor Ribeiro Martins |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 145 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 27 | 19% |
| Mexico | 6 | 4% |
| Brazil | 6 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Argentina | 4 | 3% |
| Colombia | 4 | 3% |
| Peru | 2 | 1% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 9% |
| Unknown | 73 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 84 | 58% |
| Scientists | 56 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 105 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 43% |
| Environmental Science | 16 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 27 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 184. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2023.
All research outputs
#223,346
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from Ornithological Applications
#16
of 2,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,677
of 479,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ornithological Applications
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,167 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 479,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.