↓ Skip to main content

More tornadoes in the most extreme U.S. tornado outbreaks

Overview of attention for article published in Science, December 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
118 news outlets
blogs
14 blogs
twitter
195 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
4 Google+ users
reddit
2 Redditors
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
More tornadoes in the most extreme U.S. tornado outbreaks
Published in
Science, December 2016
DOI 10.1126/science.aah7393
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael K Tippett, Chiara Lepore, Joel E Cohen

Abstract

Tornadoes and severe thunderstorms kill people and damage property every year. Estimated U.S. insured losses due to severe thunderstorms in the first half of 2016 were 8.5 billion USD. The largest U.S. impacts of tornadoes result from tornado outbreaks, which are sequences of tornadoes that occur in close succession. Here, using extreme value analysis, we find that the frequency of U.S. outbreaks with many tornadoes is increasing and is increasing faster for more extreme outbreaks. We model this behavior by extreme value distributions with parameters that are linear functions of time or of some indicators of multidecadal climatic variability. Extreme meteorological environments associated with severe thunderstorms show consistent upward trends, but the trends do not resemble those currently expected to result from global warming.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 195 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Unknown 129 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 16%
Student > Master 18 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Other 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 37 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 36 27%
Environmental Science 22 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 10%
Social Sciences 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 18 14%
Unknown 35 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1120. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#13,607
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Science
#690
of 83,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229
of 418,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science
#12
of 1,078 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,324 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 66.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,078 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.