You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Autophagy and Exosomes in the Aged Retinal Pigment Epithelium: Possible Relevance to Drusen Formation and Age-Related Macular Degeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, January 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004160 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ai Ling Wang, Thomas J. Lukas, Ming Yuan, Nga Du, Mark O. Tso, Arthur H. Neufeld |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 237 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 231 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 48 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 63 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 16% |
| Neuroscience | 15 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 11% |
| Unknown | 46 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#20,744,283
of 25,483,400 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#182,148
of 222,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,985
of 183,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#437
of 466 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,483,400 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,090 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,632 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 466 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.