↓ Skip to main content

From species descriptions to diversity patterns: the validation of taxonomic data as a keystone for ant diversity studies reproducibility and accuracy

Overview of attention for article published in Royal Society Open Science, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
37 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
From species descriptions to diversity patterns: the validation of taxonomic data as a keystone for ant diversity studies reproducibility and accuracy
Published in
Royal Society Open Science, February 2023
DOI 10.1098/rsos.221170
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rodrigo M. Feitosa, Thiago S. R. Silva, Gabriela P. Camacho, Mônica A. Ulysséa, Natalia Ladino, Aline M. Oliveira, Emília Z. de Albuquerque, Carla R. Ribas, Fernando A. Schmidt, Maria Santina de C. Morini, Rogério R. da Silva, Wesley Dáttilo, Antônio C. M. de Queiroz, Fabrício B. Baccaro, Jean C. Santos, Karine S. Carvalho, Tathiana G. Sobrinho, Yves P. Quinet, Aline B. Moraes, André B. Vargas, Helena Maura Torezan-Silingardi, Jorge Luiz P. Souza, Tatianne Marques, Thiago Izzo, Denise Lange, Iracenir A. dos Santos, Kleber Del-Claro, Larissa Nahas, Lucas Paolucci, Stela A. Soares, Ana Y. Harada, Ananza M. Rabello, Cinthia B. da Costa-Milanez, Eduardo Diehl-Fleig, Renata B. F. Campos, Ricardo Solar, Tiago Frizzo, Wesley DaRocha, Anselmo Nogueira

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 37 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 8 32%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 7 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 8 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 28%
Environmental Science 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2023.
All research outputs
#1,566,714
of 26,582,041 outputs
Outputs from Royal Society Open Science
#1,313
of 5,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,894
of 494,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Royal Society Open Science
#27
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,582,041 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 494,404 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.