↓ Skip to main content

Cognitive rehabilitation for executive dysfunction in adults with stroke or other adult non-progressive acquired brain damage

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
67 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
430 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cognitive rehabilitation for executive dysfunction in adults with stroke or other adult non-progressive acquired brain damage
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2013
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008391.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Charlie SY Chung, Alex Pollock, Tanya Campbell, Brian R Durward, Suzanne Hagen

Abstract

Executive functions are the controlling mechanisms of the brain and include the processes of planning, initiation, organisation, inhibition, problem solving, self monitoring and error correction. They are essential for goal-oriented behaviour and responding to new and novel situations. A high number of people with acquired brain injury, including around 75% of stroke survivors, will experience executive dysfunction. Executive dysfunction reduces capacity to regain independence in activities of daily living (ADL), particularly when alternative movement strategies are necessary to compensate for limb weakness. Improving executive function may lead to increased independence with ADL. There are various cognitive rehabilitation strategies for training executive function used within clinical practice and it is necessary to determine the effectiveness of these interventions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 430 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 410 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 86 20%
Researcher 60 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 59 14%
Student > Bachelor 52 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 38 9%
Other 135 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 126 29%
Psychology 107 25%
Nursing and Health Professions 47 11%
Unspecified 44 10%
Neuroscience 37 9%
Other 69 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2018.
All research outputs
#802,400
of 12,544,629 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,704
of 10,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,860
of 145,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#27
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,544,629 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,351 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,401 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.