You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
‘Left behind places’: a geographical etymology
Regional Studies, February 2023
Andy Pike, Vincent Béal, Nicolas Cauchi-Duval, Rachel Franklin, Nadir Kinossian, Thilo Lang, Tim Leibert, Danny MacKinnon, Max Rousseau, Jeroen Royer, Loris Servillo, John Tomaney, Sanne Velthuis
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 52 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Korea, Republic of||1||2%|
|Members of the public||31||60%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||3||6%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||9||17%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||2||4%|
|Student > Bachelor||2||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Economics, Econometrics and Finance||4||8%|
|Arts and Humanities||3||6%|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||1||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,823,556 outputs
Outputs from Regional Studies
of 1,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 461,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Studies
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,823,556 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,858 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,271 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.