You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Winchcombe: An example of rapid terrestrial alteration of a CM chondrite
Meteoritics & Planetary Science, February 2023
Laura E. Jenkins, Martin R. Lee, Luke Daly, Ashley J. King, Cameron J. Floyd, Pierre‐Etienne Martin, Natasha V. Almeida, Matthew J. Genge
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||25||69%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||6%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||1||14%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Physics and Astronomy||2||29%|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||1||14%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 221. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,967,663 outputs
Outputs from Meteoritics & Planetary Science
of 1,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 465,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Meteoritics & Planetary Science
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,967,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,220 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 465,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.