You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patient Satisfaction after Total Knee Arthroplasty: Who is Satisfied and Who is Not?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert B. Bourne, Bert M. Chesworth, Aileen M. Davis, Nizar N. Mahomed, Kory D. J. Charron |
| Abstract |
Despite substantial advances in primary TKA, numerous studies using historic TKA implants suggest only 82% to 89% of primary TKA patients are satisfied. We reexamined this issue to determine if contemporary TKA implants might be associated with improved patient satisfaction. We performed a cross-sectional study of patient satisfaction after 1703 primary TKAs performed in the province of Ontario. Our data confirmed that approximately one in five (19%) primary TKA patients were not satisfied with the outcome. Satisfaction with pain relief varied from 72-86% and with function from 70-84% for specific activities of daily living. The strongest predictors of patient dissatisfaction after primary TKA were expectations not met (10.7x greater risk), a low 1-year WOMAC (2.5x greater risk), preoperative pain at rest (2.4x greater risk) and a postoperative complication requiring hospital readmission (1.9x greater risk). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Norway | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 75% |
| Scientists | 2 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,256 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 1237 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 183 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 137 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 129 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 120 | 10% |
| Other | 117 | 9% |
| Other | 257 | 20% |
| Unknown | 313 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 520 | 41% |
| Engineering | 114 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 64 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 24 | 2% |
| Other | 117 | 9% |
| Unknown | 392 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#889,718
of 25,711,998 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#88
of 7,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,227
of 174,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,491 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.