You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Michigan Genetic Hereditary Testing (MiGHT) study’s innovative approaches to promote uptake of clinical genetic testing among cancer patients: a study protocol for a 3-arm randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trials, February 2023
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13063-023-07125-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lynette Hammond Gerido, Jennifer J. Griggs, Ken Resnicow, Kelley M. Kidwell, Emerson Delacroix, Sarah Austin, Erika N. Hanson, Elizabeth Bacon, Erika Koeppe, Stefanie Goodall, Matthew Demerath, Elizabeth A. Rizzo, Shayna Weiner, Sarah T. Hawley, Wendy R. Uhlmann, J. Scott Roberts, Elena M. Stoffel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 3 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2023.
All research outputs
#23,322,844
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Trials
#1,757
of 1,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#418,959
of 486,994 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trials
#27
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,994 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.