You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Low Acceptability of A/H1N1 Pandemic Vaccination in French Adult Population: Did Public Health Policy Fuel Public Dissonance?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0010199 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michaël Schwarzinger, Rémi Flicoteaux, Sébastien Cortarenoda, Yolande Obadia, Jean-Paul Moatti |
| Abstract |
In July 2009, French public health authorities embarked in a mass vaccination campaign against A/H1N1 2009 pandemic-influenza. We explored the attitudes and behaviors of the general population toward pandemic vaccination. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 33% |
| Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 12% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 20% |
| Unknown | 41 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 33% |
| Psychology | 15 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 16% |
| Unknown | 48 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,697,368
of 24,228,883 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#21,339
of 208,500 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,939
of 82,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#104
of 710 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,228,883 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 208,500 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 710 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.