You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
“Two birds with one stone” strategy for the lung cancer therapy with bioinspired AIE aggregates
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, February 2023
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12951-023-01799-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yinshan Lin, Mengmeng Yi, Xiaoling Guan, Enen Chen, Langyu Yang, Songpei Li, Ying Li, Lingmin Zhang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
Professor | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 9% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 73% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2023.
All research outputs
#18,827,700
of 23,332,901 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#947
of 1,495 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#234,495
of 348,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#39
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,332,901 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,495 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.