↓ Skip to main content

Tracking animals in freshwater with electronic tags: past, present and future

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 129)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 tweeters
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
96 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tracking animals in freshwater with electronic tags: past, present and future
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/2050-3385-1-5
Authors

Steven J Cooke, Jonathan D Midwood, Jason D Thiem, Peter Klimley, Martyn C Lucas, Eva B Thorstad, John Eiler, Chris Holbrook, Brendan C Ebner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 5 2%
Canada 4 2%
Germany 3 1%
Brazil 3 1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 239 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 60 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 22%
Student > Master 54 20%
Student > Bachelor 32 12%
Other 18 7%
Other 44 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 151 57%
Environmental Science 60 23%
Unspecified 29 11%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Computer Science 5 2%
Other 15 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,000,045
of 12,662,564 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#34
of 129 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,411
of 146,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,662,564 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 129 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them