↓ Skip to main content

Tracking animals in freshwater with electronic tags: past, present and future

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 214)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 tweeters
patent
3 patents
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
183 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
410 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tracking animals in freshwater with electronic tags: past, present and future
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/2050-3385-1-5
Authors

Steven J Cooke, Jonathan D Midwood, Jason D Thiem, Peter Klimley, Martyn C Lucas, Eva B Thorstad, John Eiler, Chris Holbrook, Brendan C Ebner

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 5 1%
United States 4 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Ecuador 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 386 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 83 20%
Student > Master 80 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 18%
Student > Bachelor 56 14%
Other 29 7%
Other 38 9%
Unknown 50 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 193 47%
Environmental Science 89 22%
Engineering 14 3%
Computer Science 8 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 2%
Other 26 6%
Unknown 72 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,719,852
of 21,346,377 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#46
of 214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,575
of 173,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,346,377 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them