↓ Skip to main content

Advice to stay active as a single treatment for low-back pain and sciatica

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advice to stay active as a single treatment for low-back pain and sciatica
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, April 2006
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003632.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gunvor Hilde, Kåre Birger Hagen, Gro Jamtvedt, Michael Winnem

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 198 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 22%
Student > Bachelor 27 14%
Researcher 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 7%
Other 48 24%
Unknown 38 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 13%
Sports and Recreations 12 6%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 6%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 44 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#4,889,696
of 19,872,770 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,034
of 11,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,734
of 412,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#93
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,872,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.