↓ Skip to main content

Foaling rates in feral horses treated with the immunocontraceptive porcine zona pellucida

Overview of attention for article published in Wildlife Society Bulletin, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Foaling rates in feral horses treated with the immunocontraceptive porcine zona pellucida
Published in
Wildlife Society Bulletin, October 2011
DOI 10.1002/wsb.66
Authors

Jason I. Ransom, James E. Roelle, Brian S. Cade, Linda Coates-Markle, Albert J. Kane

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 7%
Australia 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 26 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 30%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Master 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 50%
Social Sciences 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,172,180
of 19,629,044 outputs
Outputs from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#121
of 703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,068
of 410,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wildlife Society Bulletin
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,629,044 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 410,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.